a6iyyu
Back

Breaking Down Hydration in React VS Next.js with Simple Analogies 🚀

If you’ve coded with React but still feel a bit fuzzy about terms like hydration, SSR, or why everyone seems to love Next.js, you’re not alone. In this blog, we’ll break things down—chill vibes, but still technical enough to get the picture. Let’s dive in!

What Is Hydration? 🤔

Imagine you’re building a house. First, you set up the structure. Then, you place the furniture and install devices like lamps, fans, and a TV. At this stage, everything is in place but nothing works because there’s no electricity connected yet. The house looks complete, but it’s not functional.

Hydration in web development is similar. When React components are initially rendered on the server (such as with Next.js), they generate HTML that appears complete. However, this HTML isn’t interactive yet. Once JavaScript loads on the client and hooks into those components, everything becomes functional and interactive. That’s hydration: the process of turning static HTML into a live, interactive app.

Hydration in Plain React 🥂

If you build a typical React app (using Vite or CRA), everything is rendered on the client side.

This follows the same house analogy from earlier. Imagine you’ve just completed building the structure, moved in all the furniture, and installed devices like lamps and appliances. But none of it works until the house is wired with electricity. In web terms, the browser:

  1. Loads a mostly empty HTML shell.
  2. Downloads all the JavaScript needed for your app.
  3. Runs React to render components on the page.

Until that third step is done, the user sees either a blank screen or a loading spinner. They can’t interact with buttons, forms, or any UI element yet because the app hasn’t been fully rendered by JavaScript.

This delay impacts the First Contentful Paint (FCP), which is a metric that measures how quickly the first piece of content (like text or an image) appears on the screen. A slower FCP means users feel like your site is taking a long time to load, even if it’s technically doing a lot behind the scenes.

Hydration in Next.js 🌐

This continues the house analogy we used earlier. But this time, imagine you’re buying a house that already has the electricity wired in. The lights are on, the appliances work, and you can use everything the moment you walk in. That’s how Next.js works. It supports Server-Side Rendering (SSR) by default, which means:

  1. The server renders the HTML and sends a complete, functional-looking page to the browser.
  2. The browser displays this HTML instantly.
  3. JavaScript arrives shortly after to “hydrate” the page and enable full interactivity.

SSR & CSR: What’s the Deal? 🧐

Let’s break down two big concepts in rendering: Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and Client-Side Rendering (CSR).

a. Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

In SSR, the server does most of the heavy lifting. It prepares the HTML content before sending it to the browser. So when the browser loads the page, it sees a mostly complete document right away.

Pros:

Cons:

It’s like ordering food via an online delivery app. You don’t cook anything, you just wait, and it arrives ready to eat. The restaurant (server) does all the prep, so you get your meal fast and hot.

b. Client-Side Rendering (CSR)

With CSR, the browser receives an empty-ish HTML file, then runs JavaScript to render everything. React apps created with Vite or CRA typically use CSR.

Pros:

Cons:

It’s like getting a grocery delivery and cooking everything yourself. You have full control, but it takes longer to enjoy the final dish.

c. When to Use SSR vs CSR?

Why Is Next.js More Practical? 🤯

Think of Next.js as “React with kitchen spices included.” You don’t need to worry about a bunch of setup because it’s already done for you:

For projects small to large, Next.js gives you a ready-to-go foundation.